I really
like Wilhelm Arcturus' perspective on the game. He's a good writer, but
recently, he parroted the latest talking point in the Imperium's increasingly
desperate repertoire of attempted propaganda:
"In their effort to defeat us, our enemy has had to become us. As the CFC/Imperium had often been called Band of Brothers 2.0, the Moneybadgers have begun to look a bit like the Imperium 2.0."
This is
an obvious propaganda point, and a pretty bad one at that. Why? Because it
relies upon a false parallel that assumes the reader is foolish enough to
believe all coalitions are the same. It's disingenuous, and it frustrates me to
know end.
Here's a tip to those who resonate with this argument: the
people shooting you aren't a coalition, despite the naming.
Let's consider the
nature of the two groups being compared.
The Imperium was a group of multiple alliances that all
took orders from Mittens. Don't believe me? Time and again, alliance leaders
tried to do their own thing, and they were forcibly brought back into line.
Individual alliances were given their marching orders by Goonswarm and if they
didn't obey, they suffered consequences. Spoils of war were held initially by
GSF and distributed by agreement among other member alliances, based on how
useful they were to the GSF war effort. They fought as one, they defended each
other, they deployed together.
As a result, coalition content increasingly became the
reason people logged in. Alliance- and corp-led activity entropied, and the
coalition stepped in to fill the void. Increasingly, GSF poached corporations
and FCs from their allies. They didn't do that necessarily with ill intentions,
but rather because those corporations began to identify more with their fellow
coalition members than the members of their own alliance. When faced with the
choice of being part of a lesser partner or GSF itself, the choice was a clear
one. Consider that for a moment: they identified so much as members of the Imperium
that leaving one alliance was no big thing to them. The coalition identity
overrode their alliance identity, and in some cases corporation identity.
Now, compare that to the MBC. Its member alliances are all
still directing their own efforts. They're still feuding with each other (see
Snuff and Shadow Cartel, or Violence of Action and The Culture). And you know
what? No one is attempting to stop these feuds. You don't see PL coming in to
play peacemaker the way GSF would have in the Imperium. That's because no on
expects or wants the MBC to endure beyond the death of the Imperium.
Alliances in the MBC are running their own alliance fleets.
They tend to do their own thing, and coordinate only when necessary to take
down larger targets. Each of the alliances that consumed Imperium space did so
through their own efforts. Sure, they timed their efforts to coincide, but the
Imperium died to a number of simultaneous invasions, not a single, centrally
coordinated one.
And, the thing that started this whole thing off - IWantIsk
hiring TISHU to savage SMA - happened by the efforts of a single alliance. They
didn't wait for PL and NC. to join in. In fact, that wasn't even a gleam in
their eyes when it started. They literally did it for the lulz and paycheck.
The two groups couldn't be further apart in kind. Whereas
one was a fist, the other was death by a thousand cuts.
And it all happened not because the MBC wanted to build
some new power structure, but solely to tear down the horrible beast complacency
had allowed to be born. Once it was revealed as a paper tiger, everyone wanted
to join in. They're a coalition only to see the Imperium smashed into a
thousand pieces.
I'm sorry, but anyone who things the MBC is - in any way -
unified is delusional. This isn't a partnership joining together to control all
space, the way the Imperium was. This isn't a group moving through the ocean
together. This is a mob, rending the king to pieces for a thousand
different reasons.
Some fight against the Imperium because they were conquered
in war. Some because of Burn Jita and other ganking shenanigans. Some because
they were scammed. Some because of the arrogance. Some simply because the
Imperium was the top dog to kill. Some because they hate the type of mentality
the existence of the Imperium cultivated in its members.
Notice something about that? "It's not me. Yep,
it's you."
They don't WANT to be like the Imperium, and never will be.
The only thing getting them to work together is to push the Imperium's nose as
far into the dirt as possible, to stamp out everything it was. This is a
backlash of years of pent-up hatred.
The Imperium was unified in that it stood FOR something.
The MBC is unified AGAINST something. Coalitions fighting against a thing never
last. Stop acting as if the Imperium and the MBC are the same.
Even a cursory comparison shows that they patently are not.
Hear hear!
ReplyDeleteI got half way through reading this article full of tears over something stupid lol. You need a break from the game, bro... before you start having stress induced seizures.
ReplyDeleteBelieve it or not, I actually enjoy this kind of stuff. I'm crazy... I enjoy the shakes from PvP _and_ the agitation of a verbal argument. I'm bizarre like that.
DeleteFound the goon.
DeleteOoooh Talvorian, you shouldn't challenge Wilhelm.
ReplyDeleteHe, unlike anyone else in the game, has hands on experience in dealing with the MBC. Truly he is the most factually accurate reporter on the 'Casino War'.
/S
The differences between the MBC and the Imperium are blindingly obvious, unless you deliberately blind yourself to them.
Now, now... Wilhelm is a good writer, and I enjoy his stuff immensely. I just desperately want to free him from the echo chamber. I've been there, I understand!
DeleteThe question is, does he, in good faith, believe what he is typing?
Delete